[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de3f5502-ef81-4f44-96a9-995e512301a3@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:52:53 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ziy@...dia.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, dev.jain@....com, corbet@....net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, baohua@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org,
peterx@...hat.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, usamaarif642@...il.com,
sunnanyong@...wei.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com, anshuman.khandual@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, tiwai@...e.de, will@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, jack@...e.cz, cl@...two.org,
jglisse@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, zokeefe@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, rientjes@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
lance.yang@...ux.dev, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org, jannh@...gle.com,
pfalcato@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/15] khugepaged: mTHP support
On 15.09.25 12:48, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 12:44:34PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> Mapping that to actual THP sizes (#pages in a thp) on an arch will be easy.
>>>>
>>>> And at different mTHP levels too right?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Another point here, since we have to keep:
>>>
>>> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/max_ptes_none
>>>
>>> Around, and users will try to set values there, presumably we will now add:
>>>
>>> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/eagerness
>>>
>>> How will we map <-> the two tunables?
>>
>> Well, the easy case if someone updates eagerness, then we simply et it to
>> whatever magic value we compute and document.
>>
>> The other direction is more problematic, likely we'll simply warn and do
>> something reasonable (map it to whatever eagerness scale is closest or
>> simply indicate it as "-1" -- user intervened or sth like that)
>
> I don't love the idea of a -1 situation, as that's going to create some
> confusion.
swapiness also has a "max" parameter, so we could just say "override" /"
disabled" / whatever?
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists