[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d51ece8-cb07-450b-a91a-095abcb8472a@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:13:33 +0800
From: Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com>
To: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>, <dave@...olabs.net>,
<paulmck@...nel.org>, <josh@...htriplett.org>, <frederic@...nel.org>
CC: <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locktorture: Fix memory leak in param_set_cpumask()
在 2025/9/12 10:16, Zhang Changzhong 写道:
>
> 在 2025/9/12 9:57, Wang Liang 写道:
>> When setting the locktorture module parameter 'bind_writers', the variable
>> 'cpumask_var_t bind_writers' is allocated in param_set_cpumask(). But it
>> is not freed, when removing module or setting the parameter again.
>>
>> Below kmemleak trace is seen for this issue:
>>
>> unreferenced object 0xffff888100aabff8 (size 8):
>> comm "bash", pid 323, jiffies 4295059233
>> hex dump (first 8 bytes):
>> 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
>> backtrace (crc ac50919):
>> __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2e5/0x420
>> alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x1f/0x30
>> param_set_cpumask+0x26/0xb0 [locktorture]
>> param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
>> module_attr_store+0x1b/0x30
>> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x114/0x1b0
>> vfs_write+0x300/0x410
>> ksys_write+0x60/0xd0
>> do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>>
>> This issue can be reproduced by:
>> insmod locktorture.ko
>> echo 0-2 > /sys/module/locktorture/parameters/bind_writers
>> rmmod locktorture
>>
>> or:
>> insmod locktorture.ko
>> echo 0-2 > /sys/module/locktorture/parameters/bind_writers
>> echo 0-2 > /sys/module/locktorture/parameters/bind_writers
>>
>> The parameter 'bind_readers' also has the same problem. Free the memory
>> when removing module or setting the parameter.
>>
>> Fixes: 73e341242483 ("locktorture: Add readers_bind and writers_bind module parameters")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
>> index ce0362f0a871..cad80c050502 100644
>> --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
>> +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ static int param_set_cpumask(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
>> int ret;
>> char *s;
>>
>> + free_cpumask_var(*cm_bind);
>> + *cm_bind = NULL;
> 这个NULL没必要吧
Setting global pointer to NULL after free may be more safe. ^-^
>> +
>> if (!alloc_cpumask_var(cm_bind, GFP_KERNEL)) {
>> s = "Out of memory";
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -1211,6 +1214,12 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
>> cxt.cur_ops->exit();
>> cxt.init_called = false;
>> }
>> +
>> + free_cpumask_var(bind_readers);
>> + free_cpumask_var(bind_writers);
>> + bind_readers = NULL;
>> + bind_writers = NULL;
> 同上
>
>> +
>> torture_cleanup_end();
>> }
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists