[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMlvglecB0ZA2fmd@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:09:06 +0000
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@...gle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, joey.gouly@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, yuzenghui@...wei.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
jean-philippe@...aro.org, qperret@...gle.com, tabba@...gle.com,
mark.rutland@....com, praan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/28] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Move selftests to a
separate file
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 01:45:17PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:51:32PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > Soon, io-pgtable-arm.c will be compiled as part of the KVM/arm64
> > in the hypervisor object, which doesn't have many of the kernel APIs,
> > as faux devices, printk...
> >
> > We would need to factor this things outside of this file, this patch
> > moves the selftests outside, which remove many of the kernel
> > dependencies, which also is not needed by the hypervisor.
> > Create io-pgtable-arm-kernel.c for that, and in the next patch
> > the rest of the code is factored out.
>
> Please send this as a stand alone patch, it looks like a good idea.
>
> Also please add the boiler plate to wrap the selftest into a kunit and
> use the usual kunit machinery. We alredy have an kunit for
> smmuv3, it can just add another file to that.
Makes sense, I will do that (hopefully before the weekend)
Thanks,
Mostafa
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists