lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d74713c-00fc-4a17-92ed-b3e3420160e1@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:11:07 +0300
From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: Remove unnecessary cells from
 DSI nodes



On 9/16/25 18:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 05:19:31PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>> Fix warnings
>> Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@...isplay-subsystem@...0000/dsi@...4000:
>> unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges", "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property
>>
>> Fixes: 73db32b01c9f ("arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: add Display Serial Interface device nodes")
>> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> I haven't found a pending patch for this, so here it goes, sorry if someone
>> already sent.
> 
> Thanks, but no. The nodes are correct. I don't think we should be having
> the -cells boilerplate each time somebody adds a panel under the DSI
> node.
> 

I understand your point. But leaving out warnings for a possible future
node is not ok from my point of view.

>>
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi | 6 ------
>>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ