linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/sev: Add new dump_rmp parameter to snp_leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250916160036.GHaMmJpHHIW7RybFXD@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:00:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
	Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
	pbonzini@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, nikunj@....com,
	davem@...emloft.net, aik@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
	john.allen@....com, michael.roth@....com, Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/sev: Add new dump_rmp parameter to
 snp_leak_pages() API

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 08:58:42AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Did the patch merge correctly? I can't see how it would fail since both
> the original and new definitions are in separate parts of the #ifdef... It
> should have failed even before given the way it was changed.
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something.

Nah, you're right. Because your patch is moving sev_evict_cache(), I ended up
resolving it wrong. Sorry for the noise.

Ashish, all patches against tip go ontop of the tip/master branch. Please redo
your set ontop.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette