[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250916030459.114166-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:04:59 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm/damon/lru_sort: use param_ctx correctly
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:43:06 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:05:47 -0700 Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 18:58:04 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > damon_lru_sort_apply_parameters() allocates a new DAMON context, stages
> > > user-specified DAMON parameters on it, and commits to running DAMON
> > > context at once, using damon_commit_ctx(). The code is, however,
> > > directly updating the monitoring attributes of the running context. This
> > > doesn't cause a real user problem but apparently this is an
> > > unintentional mistake that can cause code review confusions and future
> > > real problems. Fix the wrong use of the parameter context.
[...]
> > So in particular, the global ctx will never have the correct attrs pre-patch,
> > since it will always be rewritten by param_ctx, which never had its attrs
> > initialized.
[...]
And it measn the monitoring attributes prameters of DAMON_LRU_SORT are not
working at all. I think this deserves to be a hotfix. I will send v2 of this
separately, cc-ing stable@.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists