[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMmNzpvVPH04hsIL@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 19:18:22 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Jean-François Lessard <jefflessard3@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node
iterators
Hi Danilo,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 06:14:31PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 1:54 PM CEST, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > If you're concerned of the use on ACPI platforms, none of the drivers using
> > the two available variants list any ACPI IDs, signifying they're not used
> > on ACPI systems -- I don't think they ever have been.
>
> Great -- sounds reasonable then.
I opted to add availability check on the ACPI side as well so that DT and
ACPI are aligned in not returning unavailable child devices.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists