lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMmXGjT6Nne708Xc@gate>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:58:02 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ash Logan <ash@...quark.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        officialTechflashYT@...il.com, "A. Wilcox" <AWilcox@...cox-tech.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: 32-bit HIGHMEM and game console downstreams

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 11:57:00AM +1000, Ash Logan wrote:
> On 13/9/25 23:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The smaller devices are probable getting problematic sooner, 96MB
> > in the Wii is already really tight and this only gets worse over
> > time.
> 
> The maintainer of that downstream claims to be able to boot modern text-mode
> distros on the GameCube' 24MB, which I find really impressive!

Hey, I still boot up my imac G3 sometimes (if I can find a keyboard for
it!), it has 64MB of RAM and that needs some handholding to boot already
(the zImage needs some manual header editting to fix its load address,
something like that).

But booting it does :-)

> > Just to be clear: there is no general 32-bit deprecation going on. When
> > I talked about phasing out 32-bit platforms over time, that is purely
> > going to be those that have no users left, or the few ones that are
> > causing more work than they are worth. E.g. The ppc405 ones got
> > removed recently (after many years of discussion) because they were
> > making ppc440 maintenance harder and had no known users.

Good good good.  Way too reasonable!

Thanks,


Segher

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ