[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cc527bc-41cd-48ae-a40a-05c69b2c4ac3@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 19:12:22 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Leszczynski <konrad.leszczynski@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cezary.rojewski@...el.com,
sebastian.basierski@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: stmmac: replace memcpy with ethtool_puts
in ethtool
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 05:45:30PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Konrad Leszczynski wrote:
> > Fix kernel exception by replacing memcpy with ethtool_puts when used with
> > safety feature strings in ethtool logic.
> >
> > [ +0.000023] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in stmmac_get_strings+0x17d/0x520 [stmmac]
> > [ +0.000115] Read of size 32 at addr ffffffffc0cfab20 by task ethtool/2571
> >
> > [ +0.000005] Call Trace:
> > [ +0.000004] <TASK>
> > [ +0.000003] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90
> > [ +0.000016] print_report+0xce/0x610
> > [ +0.000011] ? stmmac_get_strings+0x17d/0x520 [stmmac]
> > [ +0.000108] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0xd/0xa0
> > [ +0.000008] ? stmmac_get_strings+0x17d/0x520 [stmmac]
> > [ +0.000101] kasan_report+0xd4/0x110
> > [ +0.000010] ? stmmac_get_strings+0x17d/0x520 [stmmac]
> > [ +0.000102] kasan_check_range+0x3a/0x1c0
> > [ +0.000010] __asan_memcpy+0x24/0x70
> > [ +0.000008] stmmac_get_strings+0x17d/0x520 [stmmac]
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Basierski <sebastian.basierski@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Leszczynski <konrad.leszczynski@...el.com>
>
> As per my comment on v3 (sorry, I missed that you had already posted v4):
>
> I think it would be good to explain why using memcpy() is a problem here.
>
> I looked and it seems to me that one reason is that the strings may be
> too long.
I actually think the strings are too short. But i could be wrong.
In general, stmmac uses:
struct stmmac_stats {
char stat_string[ETH_GSTRING_LEN] __nonstring;
int sizeof_stat;
int stat_offset;
};
so the string is guaranteed to be long enough. However, these 'safety'
features make use of
struct dwmac5_error_desc {
bool valid;
const char *desc;
const char *detailed_desc;
};
where desc can be any length, ironically making
dwmac5_safety_feat_dump() unsafe. This is why i asked that this be
changed to be the same stmmac_stats, so [ETH_GSTRING_LEN]
__nonstring. But that seems to of fallen on deaf ears.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists