[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMmd/JQAfPwKuYyB@x1>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:27:24 -0700
From: Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Joel Stanley <jms@...storrent.com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Drew Fustini <dfustini@...storrent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] riscv: dts: Add Tenstorrent Blackhole A0 SoC PCIe
cards
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 02:56:05PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 15/09/2025 18:52, Drew Fustini wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 05:47:08PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 02:31:05PM -0700, Drew Fustini wrote:
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2b08023643a2cebd4f924579024290bb355c9b3
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/tenstorrent/blackhole-a0-card.dts
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> > > > +/dts-v1/;
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "blackhole-a0.dtsi"
> > > > +
> > > > +/ {
> > > > + model = "Tenstorrent Blackhole A0 SoC PCIe card";
> > > > + compatible = "tenstorrent,blackhole-a0-card", "tenstorrent,blackhole-a0";
> > > > +
> > > > + memory@0 {
> > > > + device_type = "memory";
> > > > + reg = <0x4000 0x30000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
> > >
> > > This isn't at address zero as the node address claims.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll fix the unit address.
>
> Is it time to just assume any dtc can handle a 64bit number?
Is it not valid for me to use the 64 bit hex number in the unit address?
I changed it to memory@...030000000 and 'W=1 dtbs_check' did not
complain. Am I doing something wrong?
-------------------------------------------------
$ git diff
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/tenstorrent/blackhole-a0-card.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/tenstorrent/blackhole-a0-card.dts
index b2b08023643a..7963712b53ea 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/tenstorrent/blackhole-a0-card.dts
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/tenstorrent/blackhole-a0-card.dts
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ / {
model = "Tenstorrent Blackhole A0 SoC PCIe card";
compatible = "tenstorrent,blackhole-a0-card", "tenstorrent,blackhole-a0";
- memory@0 {
+ memory@...030000000 {
device_type = "memory";
reg = <0x4000 0x30000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
};
$ make W=1 ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- -j32 dtbs_check
DTC [C] arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dtb
DTC [C] arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dtb
DTC [C] arch/riscv/boot/dts/tenstorrent/blackhole-a0-card.dtb
-------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists