[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMnV-hAwRnLJflC7@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:26:18 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 1/6] ARM: uaccess: Implement missing
__get_user_asm_dword()
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:33:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> When CONFIG_CPU_SPECTRE=n then get_user() is missing the 8 byte ASM variant
> for no real good reason. This prevents using get_user(u64) in generic code.
I'm sure you will eventually discover the reason when you start getting
all the kernel build bot warnings that will result from a cast from a
u64 to a pointer.
You're not the first to try implementing this.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists