[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916215301.664963-3-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:52:57 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 2/6] uprobe: Do not emulate/sstep original instruction when ip is changed
If uprobe handler changes instruction pointer we still execute single
step) or emulate the original instruction and increment the (new) ip
with its length.
This makes the new instruction pointer bogus and application will
likely crash on illegal instruction execution.
If user decided to take execution elsewhere, it makes little sense
to execute the original instruction, so let's skip it.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 7ca1940607bd..2b32c32bcb77 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -2741,6 +2741,13 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
+ /*
+ * If user decided to take execution elsewhere, it makes little sense
+ * to execute the original instruction, so let's skip it.
+ */
+ if (instruction_pointer(regs) != bp_vaddr)
+ goto out;
+
if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
goto out;
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists