[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916233625.GA50598@workstation.local>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:36:25 +0900
From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
To: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] firewire: core: partition fw_card spinlock
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 08:47:41AM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current implementation uses the fw_card spinlock for a wide range of
> purposes, which goes against the theory that the type of lock should
> protect critical sections as narrowly as possible.
>
> This patchset adds some spinlocks for specific purposes, therefore
> partitioning the existing wide-purpose lock.
>
> Takashi Sakamoto (6):
> firewire: core: use scoped_guard() to manage critical section to
> update topology
> firewire: core: maintain phy packet receivers locally in cdev layer
> firewire: core: use spin lock specific to topology map
> firewire: core: use spin lock specific to transaction
> firewire: core: use spin lock specific to timer for split transaction
> firewire: core: annotate fw_destroy_nodes with must-hold-lock
>
> drivers/firewire/core-card.c | 23 +++--
> drivers/firewire/core-cdev.c | 27 ++++--
> drivers/firewire/core-topology.c | 92 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/firewire.h | 33 ++++---
> 5 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
Applied to for-next branch.
Regards
Takashi Sakamoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists