[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdJ8MH=S4GbEbuky0-gFFxhKbBHsNiiajh-+jxCSPMDXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:32:45 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] iio: adc: Support ROHM BD79112 ADC/GPIO
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:13 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:12:34 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 10:12:43AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
...
> > > + data->vref_mv = ret / 1000;
> >
> > I still think moving to _mV is the right thing to do.
> > There is no 'mv' in the physics for Volts.
>
> I'm not disagreeing with this review but I'm also not going to hold a
> driver back for that given timing is pretty much such that I merge it
> today or it sits a cycle and this one is very near...
Sure, nothing in my last reply is anyhow a serious obstacle.
> I'll get fussier on this once we have written up some guidance and may
> well send a patch to modify existing recent cases like this one!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists