[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5736df73-c90e-4f11-b461-c38da4e811e1@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:59:04 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaraman.narayanamurthy@....qualcomm.com>,
David Collins <david.collins@....qualcomm.com>,
György Kurucz <me@...uczgy.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@....qualcomm.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] power: supply: qcom_battmgr: Add resistance power
supply property
On 9/16/25 4:31 AM, Fenglin Wu wrote:
>
> On 9/15/2025 6:18 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:49:55PM +0800, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> Add power supply property to get battery internal resistance from
>>> the battery management firmware.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> # on Thinkpad T14S OLED
>> T14S is X1E80100, which uses SC8280XP-specific sets of properties. This
>> patch changes only SM8350-related data. How was it tested?
>
> I assumed that Neil has picked the series of the changes and tested the charge control limit functionality on his T14S device.
>
> When I run "b4 trailers -u", the tag was added on all patches. I will remove the "Tested-by" trailer for the patches with functionality not applicable for X1E80100 platform.
+ Konstantin
It's quite common to see someone leaving a T-b on the cover letter,
trying to say "I gave this series a spin" and then seeing the tag
appear on unrelated commits within the series (e.g. bindings or some
cosmetic fixes". Maybe some sort of an interactive (opt-in is fine)
dialog for "which patches to apply t-b/tags to" could be worth the
effort?
I was imagining two options:
$ b4 trailers -u --lalala
> Grabbing tags..
> Found:
> [Patch 0/n] Very Nice Changeset
> Tested-by: Foo Bar <foo@....com>
>
> Which patches do you want the Tested-by tags to apply to? [all]: 2-5
or:
$ b4 trailers -u --lalala2
> Grabbing tagsd..
> Found:
> [Patch 0/n] Very Nice Changeset
> Apply to Patch 1 ("soc: qcom: Fix all bugs")? [Y/n/a] y
> Apply to Patch 2 ("dt-bindings: foobarbaz")? [Y/n/a] n
> Apply to Patch 3 ("clk: qcom: Fix ABCD")? [Y/n/a] a
> Applying to Patch 4 ("clk: qcom: Fix DEFG")
> . . .
> Applying to Patch n ("clk: qcom: Fix XYZ")
> Tags applied!
As I'm writing this, I'm thinking option 2 offers much more
fine-grained control, which is always nice to see..
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists