[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916092949.4118999-1-rk0006818@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:59:49 +0530
From: Rahul Kumar <rk0006818@...il.com>
To: Felix.Kuehling@....com,
alexander.deucher@....com,
christian.koenig@....com,
airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
rk0006818@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Use kmalloc_array() instead of kmalloc()
Documentation/process/deprecated.rst recommends against the use of
kmalloc with dynamic size calculations due to the risk of overflow and
smaller allocation being made than the caller was expecting.
Replace kmalloc() with kmalloc_array() in amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c
to make the intended allocation size clearer and avoid potential
overflow issues.
Signed-off-by: Rahul Kumar <rk0006818@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c
index 04ef0ca10541..0239114fb6c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int kgd_hqd_dump(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
(*dump)[i++][1] = RREG32_SOC15_IP(GC, addr); \
} while (0)
- *dump = kmalloc(HQD_N_REGS*2*sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+ *dump = kmalloc_array(HQD_N_REGS, sizeof(**dump), GFP_KERNEL);
if (*dump == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static int kgd_hqd_sdma_dump(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
#undef HQD_N_REGS
#define HQD_N_REGS (19+6+7+10)
- *dump = kmalloc(HQD_N_REGS*2*sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+ *dump = kmalloc_array(HQD_N_REGS, sizeof(**dump), GFP_KERNEL);
if (*dump == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists