[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916093337.3161016-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:33:37 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
jack@...e.cz,
hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...weicloud.com,
libaokun1@...wei.com,
yukuai3@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: wait for ongoing I/O to complete before freeing blocks
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
When freeing metadata blocks in nojournal mode, ext4_forget() calls
bforget() to clear the dirty flag on the buffer_head and remvoe
associated mappings. This is acceptable if the metadata has not yet
begun to be written back. However, if the write-back has already started
but is not yet completed, ext4_forget() will have no effect.
Subsequently, ext4_mb_clear_bb() will immediately return the block to
the mb allocator. This block can then be reallocated immediately,
potentially causing an data corruption issue.
Fix this by clearing the buffer's dirty flag and waiting for the ongoing
I/O to complete, ensuring that no further writes to stale data will
occur.
Fixes: 16e08b14a455 ("ext4: cleanup clean_bdev_aliases() calls")
Reported-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/a9417096-9549-4441-9878-b1955b899b4e@huaweicloud.com/
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
index b3e9b7bd7978..a0e66bc10093 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
@@ -280,9 +280,16 @@ int __ext4_forget(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle,
bh, is_metadata, inode->i_mode,
test_opt(inode->i_sb, DATA_FLAGS));
- /* In the no journal case, we can just do a bforget and return */
+ /*
+ * In the no journal case, we should wait for the ongoing buffer
+ * to complete and do a forget.
+ */
if (!ext4_handle_valid(handle)) {
- bforget(bh);
+ if (bh) {
+ clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
+ wait_on_buffer(bh);
+ __bforget(bh);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.46.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists