[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMk2oZx1zrO1XoWs@archie.me>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:06:25 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>,
Johannes Bechberger <me@...tlynerdless.de>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>,
Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@...y.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jake Rice <jake@...erice.dev>,
Cengiz Can <cengiz@...nel.wtf>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Documentation: cgroup-v2: Add section numbers
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 11:36:25AM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 07:40:29PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Erm, so in addition to keeping manual ToC in sync, we'd also need to
> > > maintain the section numbers manually?
> >
> > Right.
>
> I mean -- that's not right. Either generate all automatically (original
> approach) or simplify maintenance of the manual ToC (as liked by Tejun)
> by stripping (meaningless?) manual numbers.
Do you mean either I have to use .. contents:: and remove the manual ToC
(as in v1) or sync the manual ToC without section numbers?
Confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists