[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916121939.GB82444@unreal>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:19:39 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] dma-mapping: remove unused mapping resource
callbacks
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:32:07AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
>
> After ARM conversion to use physical addresses for the mapping,
> there is no in-kernel users for map_resource/unmap_resource callbacks,
> so remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 6 ------
> kernel/dma/mapping.c | 16 ++++------------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
This patch is premature, I missed another map_resource user in
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c.
Thanks
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> index 25603cb273769..a2ec1566aa270 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
> @@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ struct dma_map_ops {
> enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs);
> void (*unmap_sg)(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs);
> - dma_addr_t (*map_resource)(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> - size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> - unsigned long attrs);
> - void (*unmap_resource)(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> - size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> - unsigned long attrs);
> void (*sync_single_for_cpu)(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir);
> void (*sync_single_for_device)(struct device *dev,
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> index 4080aebe5debb..32a85bfdf873a 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ dma_addr_t dma_map_phys(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> {
> const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
> bool is_mmio = attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO;
> - dma_addr_t addr;
> + dma_addr_t addr = DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
>
> BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
>
> @@ -171,18 +171,13 @@ dma_addr_t dma_map_phys(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
> addr = iommu_dma_map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> else if (ops->map_phys)
> addr = ops->map_phys(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> - else if (is_mmio) {
> - if (!ops->map_resource)
> - return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> -
> - addr = ops->map_resource(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> - } else {
> + else if (!is_mmio && ops->map_page) {
> struct page *page = phys_to_page(phys);
> size_t offset = offset_in_page(phys);
>
> /*
> * The dma_ops API contract for ops->map_page() requires
> - * kmappable memory, while ops->map_resource() does not.
> + * kmappable memory.
> */
> addr = ops->map_page(dev, page, offset, size, dir, attrs);
> }
> @@ -227,10 +222,7 @@ void dma_unmap_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
> iommu_dma_unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> else if (ops->unmap_phys)
> ops->unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> - else if (is_mmio) {
> - if (ops->unmap_resource)
> - ops->unmap_resource(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> - } else
> + else
> ops->unmap_page(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> trace_dma_unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir, attrs);
> debug_dma_unmap_phys(dev, addr, size, dir);
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists