[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <523d8d6c-de99-435f-a01b-1bac72810d53@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:30:48 +0100
From: Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>
To: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Fix UAF in get_delegate_value
2025-09-17 11:47 UTC+0800 ~ Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
> The return value ret pointer is pointing opts_copy, but opts_copy
> gets freed in get_delegate_value before return, fix this by free
> the mntent->mnt_opts strdup memory after show delegate value.
>
> Fixes: 2d812311c2b2 ("bpftool: Add bpf_token show")
> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c
> index 82b829e44c8..05bc76c7276 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c
> @@ -28,15 +28,14 @@ static bool has_delegate_options(const char *mnt_ops)
> strstr(mnt_ops, "delegate_attachs");
> }
>
> -static char *get_delegate_value(const char *opts, const char *key)
> +static char *get_delegate_value(char *opts, const char *key)
> {
> char *token, *rest, *ret = NULL;
> - char *opts_copy = strdup(opts);
>
> - if (!opts_copy)
> + if (!opts)
> return NULL;
>
> - for (token = strtok_r(opts_copy, ",", &rest); token;
> + for (token = strtok_r(opts, ",", &rest); token;
> token = strtok_r(NULL, ",", &rest)) {
> if (strncmp(token, key, strlen(key)) == 0 &&
> token[strlen(key)] == '=') {
> @@ -44,24 +43,19 @@ static char *get_delegate_value(const char *opts, const char *key)
> break;
> }
> }
> - free(opts_copy);
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void print_items_per_line(const char *input, int items_per_line)
> +static void print_items_per_line(char *input, int items_per_line)
> {
> - char *str, *rest, *strs;
> + char *str, *rest;
> int cnt = 0;
>
> if (!input)
> return;
>
> - strs = strdup(input);
> - if (!strs)
> - return;
> -
> - for (str = strtok_r(strs, ":", &rest); str;
> + for (str = strtok_r(input, ":", &rest); str;
> str = strtok_r(NULL, ":", &rest)) {
> if (cnt % items_per_line == 0)
> printf("\n\t ");
> @@ -69,38 +63,39 @@ static void print_items_per_line(const char *input, int items_per_line)
> printf("%-20s", str);
> cnt++;
> }
> -
> - free(strs);
> }
>
> +#define PRINT_DELEGATE_OPT(opt_name) do { \
> + char *opts, *value; \
> + opts = strdup(mntent->mnt_opts); \
> + value = get_delegate_value(opts, opt_name); \
> + print_items_per_line(value, ITEMS_PER_LINE); \
> + free(opts); \
> +} while (0)
Thanks! The fix looks OK to me, but why do you need to have
PRINT_DELEGATE_OPT*() as macros? Can't you just use functions instead?
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists