[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69dc8b58-b214-4397-b09e-f52b817335b9@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:33:00 -0500
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
To: Shaurya Rane <ssrane_b23@...vjti.ac.in>
Cc: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+0cee785b798102696a4b@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+c4f3462d8b2ad7977bea@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jfs: fix uninitialized waitqueue in transaction manager
On 8/24/25 3:13PM, Shaurya Rane wrote:
> The transaction manager initialization in txInit() was not properly
> initializing TxBlock[0].waitor waitqueue, causing a crash when
> txEnd(0) is called on read-only filesystems.
>
> When a filesystem is mounted read-only, txBegin() returns tid=0 to
> indicate no transaction. However, txEnd(0) still gets called and
> tries to access TxBlock[0].waitor via tid_to_tblock(0), but this
> waitqueue was never initialized because the initialization loop
> started at index 1 instead of 0.
>
> This causes a 'non-static key' lockdep warning and system crash:
> INFO: trying to register non-static key in txEnd
>
> Fix by ensuring all transaction blocks including TxBlock[0] have
> their waitqueues properly initialized during txInit().
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+c4f3462d8b2ad7977bea@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaurya Rane <ssrane_b23@...vjti.ac.in>
Looks good, and the code even looks prettier. Applying and testing.
Thanks,
Shaggy
> ---
> fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
> index be17e3c43582..7840a03e5bcb 100644
> --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
> +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c
> @@ -272,14 +272,15 @@ int txInit(void)
> if (TxBlock == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - for (k = 1; k < nTxBlock - 1; k++) {
> - TxBlock[k].next = k + 1;
> + for (k = 0; k < nTxBlock; k++) {
> init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].gcwait);
> init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].waitor);
> }
> +
> + for (k = 1; k < nTxBlock - 1; k++) {
> + TxBlock[k].next = k + 1;
> + }
> TxBlock[k].next = 0;
> - init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].gcwait);
> - init_waitqueue_head(&TxBlock[k].waitor);
>
> TxAnchor.freetid = 1;
> init_waitqueue_head(&TxAnchor.freewait);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists