linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the i2c tree with the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aMskxYrDxyzXPsBy@shikoro>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 23:14:45 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
	Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>,
	Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the i2c tree with the arm-soc tree

Hi Thierry,

> Note also that I only applied the DT bindings patch from the v6 series
> because it was already acked by device tree maintainers and there have
> not been any objections to the DT bits, nor are they relevant to the
> driver changes still being reviewed.

May I suggest then to send the DT bindings patch seperately next time?
We can apply it earlier then, so you can continue your work. I prefer to
take binding patches via the I2C tree so I can chime in if necessary and
also to keep the merge conflicts low.

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)