[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875xdh35ds.fsf@yellow.woof>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:27:59 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner
<brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Soheil Hassas
Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] eventpoll: Fix epoll_wait() report false negative
Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de> writes:
> While staring at epoll, I noticed ep_events_available() looks wrong. I
> wrote a small program to confirm, and yes it is definitely wrong.
>
> This series adds a reproducer to kselftest, and fix the bug.
Friendly reminder that this exists.
This probably only appears once in a blue moon, and the impact is
probably not significant. But it still should be fixed.
Nam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists