linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aMprUig11RJudhWO@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:03:30 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review

On Tue 2025-09-09 19:40:49, Vijayendra Suman wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/09/25 1:27 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release.
> > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/
> > patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> No issues were seen on x86_64 and aarch64 platforms with our testing.
> 
> Tested-by: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@...cle.com>> >

A little bit too many ">"s there. I guess there's missing \n or two
there :-).

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
In cooperation with DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich,
Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)