[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMp4BrEpqXOW9nam@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:57:42 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] printk: nbcon: Export console_is_usable
On Mon 2025-09-15 08:20:30, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> The helper will be used on KDB code in the next commits.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Nit :-)
The ordering of the tags is important. It defines the timeline of
the related actions.
The above ordering might be understood as that Petr reviewed
an older version of patch. But it was later modified by Marcos.
The expected ordering is:
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
It means that Macros developed a patch and Petr reviewed it.
The patch was not longer modified.
Note the Reviewed-by tag might be preserved even when Marcos
later did some cosmetic changes, e.g. fixed a typo, formatting,
or rebased.
Best Regards,
Petr
PS: There is no need to send v5 just because of this. I could fix
it when committing the patch...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists