[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dde7c50-a222-4984-bb69-07ace724f161@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:38:32 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, Xu Xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Giorgi Tchankvetadze <giorgitchankvetadze1997@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/ksm: Fix incorrect KSM counter handling in
mm_struct during fork
On 15.09.25 17:03, Donet Tom wrote:
> Currently, the KSM-related counters in `mm_struct`, such as
> `ksm_merging_pages`, `ksm_rmap_items`, and `ksm_zero_pages`, are
> inherited by the child process during fork. This results in inconsistent
> accounting.
>
> When a process uses KSM, identical pages are merged and an rmap item is
> created for each merged page. The `ksm_merging_pages` and
> `ksm_rmap_items` counters are updated accordingly. However, after a
> fork, these counters are copied to the child while the corresponding
> rmap items are not. As a result, when the child later triggers an
> unmerge, there are no rmap items present in the child, so the counters
> remain stale, leading to incorrect accounting.
>
> A similar issue exists with `ksm_zero_pages`, which maintains both a
> global counter and a per-process counter. During fork, the per-process
> counter is inherited by the child, but the global counter is not
> incremented. Since the child also references zero pages, the global
> counter should be updated as well. Otherwise, during zero-page unmerge,
> both the global and per-process counters are decremented, causing the
> global counter to become inconsistent.
>
> To fix this, ksm_merging_pages and ksm_rmap_items are reset to 0
> during fork, and the global ksm_zero_pages counter is updated with the
> per-process ksm_zero_pages value inherited by the child. This ensures
> that KSM statistics remain accurate and reflect the activity of each
> process correctly.
>
> Fixes: 7609385337a4 ("ksm: count ksm merging pages for each process")
> Fixes: cb4df4cae4f2 ("ksm: count allocated ksm rmap_items for each process")
> Fixes: e2942062e01d ("ksm: count all zero pages placed by KSM")
> cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.6
> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ksm.h | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ksm.h b/include/linux/ksm.h
> index 22e67ca7cba3..067538fc4d58 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ksm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ksm.h
> @@ -56,8 +56,14 @@ static inline long mm_ksm_zero_pages(struct mm_struct *mm)
> static inline void ksm_fork(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm)
> {
> /* Adding mm to ksm is best effort on fork. */
> - if (mm_flags_test(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, oldmm))
> + if (mm_flags_test(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, oldmm)) {
> + long nr_ksm_zero_pages = atomic_long_read(&mm->ksm_zero_pages);
> +
> + mm->ksm_merging_pages = 0;
> + mm->ksm_rmap_items = 0;
> + atomic_long_add(nr_ksm_zero_pages, &ksm_zero_pages);
> __ksm_enter(mm);
That LGTM. KSM is all weird in combination with fork(), but that's
something for another day to improve I guess.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists