linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64/gcs/basic-gcs: Respect parent directory CFLAGS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28ff3ed7-9380-4baf-aee4-ce1ffbd2a40a@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:53:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64/gcs/basic-gcs: Respect parent directory
 CFLAGS

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:51:35PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:

> Restructure the rule for basic-gcs to respect the $(CFLAGS).
> Also drop those options which are already provided by $(CFLAGS).

I think I was concerned about CFLAGS having things in it that weren't
appropriate for nolibc since the build setup is kind of fiddly, but I'm
not sure how real a concern that is:

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)