[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<CO1PR18MB47473C9867B184DDDB51E1C5D817A@CO1PR18MB4747.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:24:22 +0000
From: Sathesh B Edara <sedara@...vell.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Satananda
Burla <sburla@...vell.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Haseeb Gani <hgani@...vell.com>, "andrew@...n.ch"
<andrew@...n.ch>,
Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [net PATCH v2] octeon_ep: Clear VF info at PF when
VF driver is removed
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:12:25AM -0700, Sathesh B Edara wrote:
> > When a VF (Virtual Function) driver is removed, the PF (Physical
> > Function) driver continues to retain stale VF-specific information.
> > This can lead to inconsistencies or unexpected behavior when the VF is
> > re-initialized or reassigned.
> >
> > This patch ensures that the PF driver clears the corresponding VF info
> > when the VF driver is removed, maintaining a clean state and
> > preventing potential issues.
> >
> > Fixes: cde29af9e68e ("octeon_ep: add PF-VF mailbox communication")
> > Signed-off-by: Sathesh B Edara <sedara@...vell.com>
> > ---
> > Changes:
> > V2:
> > - Commit header format corrected.
>
> Hi,
>
> I feel that I must be missing something terribly obvious.
> But this patch seems to be a subset of the one at the link below.
>
You're absolutely right — apologies for the confusion. I mistakenly sent the wrong patch and so marked its state as 'Not Applicable'.
Please disregard this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists