[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7eeb2adc-4936-4af2-a24b-b3a3ae09176f@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:29:24 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>, Junhao He <hejunhao3@...wei.com>,
james.clark@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com, leo.yan@....com
Cc: yangyicong@...ilicon.com, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, prime.zeng@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] coresight: tmc: refactor the tmc-etr mode setting
to avoid race conditions
On 18/09/2025 10:15, Yicong Yang wrote:
> On 2025/8/18 16:05, Junhao He wrote:
>> When trying to run perf and sysfs mode simultaneously, the WARN_ON()
>> in tmc_etr_enable_hw() is triggered sometimes:
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 42 PID: 3911571 at drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c:1060 tmc_etr_enable_hw+0xc0/0xd8 [coresight_tmc]
>> [..snip..]
>> Call trace:
>> tmc_etr_enable_hw+0xc0/0xd8 [coresight_tmc] (P)
>> tmc_enable_etr_sink+0x11c/0x250 [coresight_tmc] (L)
>> tmc_enable_etr_sink+0x11c/0x250 [coresight_tmc]
>> coresight_enable_path+0x1c8/0x218 [coresight]
>> coresight_enable_sysfs+0xa4/0x228 [coresight]
>> enable_source_store+0x58/0xa8 [coresight]
>> dev_attr_store+0x20/0x40
>> sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x68
>> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x120/0x1b8
>> vfs_write+0x2c8/0x388
>> ksys_write+0x74/0x108
>> __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x38
>> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x64/0x148
>> do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
>> el0_svc+0x3c/0x130
>> el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xd0
>> el0t_64_sync+0x1ac/0x1b0
>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>
>> Since the sysfs buffer allocation and the hardware enablement is not
>> in the same critical region, it's possible to race with the perf
>>
>> mode:
>> [sysfs mode] [perf mode]
>> tmc_etr_get_sysfs_buffer()
>> spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock)
>> [sysfs buffer allocation]
>> spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock)
>> spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock)
>> tmc_etr_enable_hw()
>> drvdata->etr_buf = etr_perf->etr_buf
>> spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock)
>> spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock)
>> tmc_etr_enable_hw()
>> WARN_ON(drvdata->etr_buf) // WARN sicne etr_buf initialized at
>> the perf side
>> spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock)
>>
>> A race condition is introduced here, perf always prioritizes execution, and
>> warnings can lead to concerns about potential hidden bugs, such as getting
>> out of sync.
>>
>> To fix this, configure the tmc-etr mode before invoking enable_etr_perf()
>> or enable_etr_sysfs(), explicitly check if the tmc-etr sink is already
>> enabled in a different mode, and simplily the setup and checks for "mode".
>> To prevent race conditions between mode transitions.
>>
>> Fixes: 296b01fd106e ("coresight: Refactor out buffer allocation function for ETR")
>> Reported-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20241202092419.11777-2-yangyicong@huawei.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@...wei.com>
>
> Tested by running perf and sysfs mode simultaneously, no warning reproduced.
>
> Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
>
>> ---
>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 80 ++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> index b07fcdb3fe1a..06c74717be19 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static struct etr_buf *tmc_etr_get_sysfs_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> }
>>
>> - if (drvdata->reading || coresight_get_mode(csdev) == CS_MODE_PERF) {
>> + if (drvdata->reading) {
>> ret = -EBUSY;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> @@ -1300,20 +1300,18 @@ static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_sysfs(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>
>> /*
>> - * In sysFS mode we can have multiple writers per sink. Since this
>> - * sink is already enabled no memory is needed and the HW need not be
>> - * touched, even if the buffer size has changed.
>> + * When two sysfs sessions race to acquire an idle sink, both may enter
>> + * this function. We need to recheck if the sink is already in use to
>> + * prevent duplicate hardware configuration.
>> */
>> - if (coresight_get_mode(csdev) == CS_MODE_SYSFS) {
>> + if (csdev->refcnt) {
>> csdev->refcnt++;
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> ret = tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata, sysfs_buf);
>> - if (!ret) {
>> - coresight_set_mode(csdev, CS_MODE_SYSFS);
>> + if (!ret)
>> csdev->refcnt++;
>> - }
>>
>> out:
>> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> @@ -1729,39 +1727,24 @@ static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *data)
>> {
>> int rc = 0;
>> pid_t pid;
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>> struct perf_output_handle *handle = data;
>> struct etr_perf_buffer *etr_perf = etm_perf_sink_config(handle);
>>
>> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> - /* Don't use this sink if it is already claimed by sysFS */
>> - if (coresight_get_mode(csdev) == CS_MODE_SYSFS) {
>> - rc = -EBUSY;
>> - goto unlock_out;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (WARN_ON(!etr_perf || !etr_perf->etr_buf)) {
>> - rc = -EINVAL;
>> - goto unlock_out;
>> - }
>> + if (WARN_ON(!etr_perf || !etr_perf->etr_buf))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> /* Get a handle on the pid of the session owner */
>> pid = etr_perf->pid;
>>
>> /* Do not proceed if this device is associated with another session */
>> - if (drvdata->pid != -1 && drvdata->pid != pid) {
>> - rc = -EBUSY;
>> - goto unlock_out;
>> - }
>> + if (drvdata->pid != -1 && drvdata->pid != pid)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * No HW configuration is needed if the sink is already in
>> - * use for this session.
>> - */
>> + /* The sink is already in use for this session */
>> if (drvdata->pid == pid) {
>> csdev->refcnt++;
>> - goto unlock_out;
>> + return rc;
>> }
>>
>> rc = tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata, etr_perf->etr_buf);
>> @@ -1773,22 +1756,43 @@ static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *data)
>> csdev->refcnt++;
>> }
>>
>> -unlock_out:
>> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>> enum cs_mode mode, void *data)
>> {
>> - switch (mode) {
>> - case CS_MODE_SYSFS:
>> - return tmc_enable_etr_sink_sysfs(csdev);
>> - case CS_MODE_PERF:
>> - return tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(csdev, data);
>> - default:
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &drvdata->spinlock) {
>> + if (coresight_get_mode(csdev) != CS_MODE_DISABLED &&
>> + coresight_get_mode(csdev) != mode)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + switch (mode) {
>> + case CS_MODE_SYSFS:
>> + if (csdev->refcnt) {
>> + /* The sink is already enabled */
>> + csdev->refcnt++;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + coresight_set_mode(csdev, mode);
Why are we spilling bits here in the common code for sysfs ? More on
this, see below.
>> + break;
>> + case CS_MODE_PERF:
>> + return tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(csdev, data);
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc = tmc_enable_etr_sink_sysfs(csdev);
We now call the above function without the spinlock and the refcnt is
managed with and without the spinlock by the users. This is problematic,
with refcnt being a non-atomic type.
Please fix. I don't see why we can't set the mode in
tmc_enable_etr_sink_sysfs() with the locks held and
reset the mode if we failed enable it properly.
Suzuki
>> + if (rc) {
>> + scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &drvdata->spinlock)
>> + coresight_set_mode(csdev, CS_MODE_DISABLED);
>> }
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> }
>>
>> static int tmc_disable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists