[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250918075651.4676f808@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 07:56:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Siddharth Vadapalli
<s-vadapalli@...com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Nishanth Menon
<nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo
<kristo@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S .
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...tq-group.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Revert "net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: fixup
PHY mode for fixed RGMII TX delay"
On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 15:45:08 +0200 Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > > Disabling the TX delay may or may not result in an operational system.
> > > This holds true for all SoCs with various CPSW instances that are
> > > programmed by the am65-cpsw-nuss.c driver along with the phy-gmii-sel.c
> > > driver.
> >
> > In that case u-boot shall be fixed, soon. And to workaround older
> > u-boot versions, linux shall always enable that delay, like Andrew
> > proposed.
>
> I can submit my patch for U-Boot some time this week, probably tomorrow. Do you
> also want me to take care of the Linux side for enabling the MAC delay?
What's the conclusion with this regression?
If we need a fix in Linux it'd be great to have it before v6.17 is cut.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists