linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of/irq: Add msi-parent check to of_msi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+XKT+HkE0W0BLKbQ76RtgBrKToLAVaWOy80mLkD=x0+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:44:23 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@....com>, 
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/irq: Add msi-parent check to of_msi_xlate()

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:21 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lpieralisi@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 08:55:55AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 11:18:58AM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > In some legacy platforms the MSI controller for a PCI host
> > > bridge is identified by an msi-parent property whose phandle
> > > points at an MSI controller node with no #msi-cells property,
> > > that implicitly means #msi-cells == 0.
> > >
> > > For such platforms, mapping a device ID and retrieving the
> > > MSI controller node becomes simply a matter of checking
> > > whether in the device hierarchy there is an msi-parent property
> > > pointing at an MSI controller node with such characteristics.
> > >
> > > Add a helper function to of_msi_xlate() to check the msi-parent
> > > property in addition to msi-map and retrieve the MSI controller
> > > node (with a 1:1 ID deviceID-IN<->deviceID-OUT mapping) to
> > > provide support for deviceID mapping and MSI controller node
> > > retrieval for such platforms.
> >
> > Your line wrapping is a bit short.
> >
> > I had a look at who is parsing "msi-parent" themselves as that's
> > typically a recipe for doing it incorrectly ('interrupt-map' anyone).
> > Can we make iproc_pcie_msi_enable() use this? It's quite ugly reaching
> > into the GICv3 node...
>
> I am not sure I get what you mean here. Possibly iproc_pcie_msi_enable()
> can reuse this patch's code if I extend it and make it a global function,
> yes and somehow use that function to carry out the check for an
> msi-parent property with no #msi-cells property or an #msi-cells == 0.

I meant using of_msi_xlate() (or even of_msi_get_domain()).

> Don't get what GICv3 node has to do with that though, sorry.

Just trace what the code there does after it gets the MSI parent. I
didn't study it too closely, but why is a iProc PCIe parsing GICv3 MSI
stuff itself? There's either some missing feature in the
irqchip/domain APIs or it's being dumb.

Rob