linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] smp: Fix up and expand the smp_call_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ivDy8DrAe0BBuN47eU0FZXb_FgEATCwMHL1HnwR7uDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:19:52 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] smp: Fix up and expand the smp_call_function_many() kerneldoc

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:17 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18 2025 at 12:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:31 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 16 2025 at 16:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> The smp_call_function_many() kerneldoc comment got out of sync with the
> >> >> function definition (bool parameter "wait" is incorrectly described as a
> >> >> bitmask in it), so fix it up by copying the "wait" description from the
> >> >> smp_call_function() kerneldoc and add information regarding the handling
> >> >> of the local CPU to it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Fixes: 49b3bd213a9f ("smp: Fix all kernel-doc warnings")
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >> >
> >> > It's been a week and no feedback.
> >> >
> >> > Well, in the further absence of any, I'll assume no concerns and just
> >> > queue this up.
> >>
> >> Sorry, was distracted. No objections from my side. Did you queue it
> >> already?
> >
> > No, I didn't.
>
> I pick it up

Thanks!