lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHy=t29buypWspUjZLHfFjnbixSENfo4we5Q5h_yrSKXJgc2QA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:06:16 +0100
From: Shameer Kolothum <shameerkolothum@...il.com>
To: liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, jgg@...dia.com, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...neuler.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: adapt to new migration configuration

On Thu, 18 Sept 2025 at 02:29, liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2025/9/11 19:30, liulongfang wrote:
> > On 2025/9/11 16:05, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 03:26, Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On new platforms greater than QM_HW_V3, the migration region has been
> >>> relocated from the VF to the PF. The VF's own configuration space is
> >>> restored to the complete 64KB, and there is no need to divide the
> >>> size of the BAR configuration space equally. The driver should be
> >>> modified accordingly to adapt to the new hardware device.
> >>>
> >>> On the older hardware platform QM_HW_V3, the live migration configuration
> >>> region is placed in the latter 32K portion of the VF's BAR2 configuration
> >>> space. On the new hardware platform QM_HW_V4, the live migration
> >>> configuration region also exists in the same 32K area immediately following
> >>> the VF's BAR2, just like on QM_HW_V3.
> >>>
> >>> However, access to this region is now controlled by hardware. Additionally,
> >>> a copy of the live migration configuration region is present in the PF's
> >>> BAR2 configuration space. On the new hardware platform QM_HW_V4, when an
> >>> older version of the driver is loaded, it behaves like QM_HW_V3 and uses
> >>> the configuration region in the VF, ensuring that the live migration
> >>> function continues to work normally. When the new version of the driver is
> >>> loaded, it directly uses the configuration region in the PF. Meanwhile,
> >>> hardware configuration disables the live migration configuration region
> >>> in the VF's BAR2: reads return all 0xF values, and writes are silently
> >>> ignored.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerkolothum@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    | 205 ++++++++++++------
> >>>  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.h    |  13 ++
> >>>  2 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> >>> index 397f5e445136..fcf692a7bd4c 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> >>> @@ -125,6 +125,72 @@ static int qm_get_cqc(struct hisi_qm *qm, u64 *addr)
> >>>         return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> +static int qm_get_xqc_regs(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
> >>> +                          struct acc_vf_data *vf_data)
> >>> +{
> >>> +       struct hisi_qm *qm = &hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm;
> >>> +       struct device *dev = &qm->pdev->dev;
> >>> +       u32 eqc_addr, aeqc_addr;
> >>> +       int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +       if (hisi_acc_vdev->drv_mode == HW_ACC_V3) {
> >>> +               eqc_addr = QM_EQC_DW0;
> >>> +               aeqc_addr = QM_AEQC_DW0;
> >>> +       } else {
> >>> +               eqc_addr = QM_EQC_PF_DW0;
> >>> +               aeqc_addr = QM_AEQC_PF_DW0;
> >>> +       }
> >>> +
> >>> +       /* QM_EQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> +       ret = qm_read_regs(qm, eqc_addr, vf_data->qm_eqc_dw, 7);
> >>> +       if (ret) {
> >>> +               dev_err(dev, "failed to read QM_EQC_DW\n");
> >>> +               return ret;
> >>> +       }
> >>> +
> >>> +       /* QM_AEQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> +       ret = qm_read_regs(qm, aeqc_addr, vf_data->qm_aeqc_dw, 7);
> >>> +       if (ret) {
> >>> +               dev_err(dev, "failed to read QM_AEQC_DW\n");
> >>> +               return ret;
> >>> +       }
> >>> +
> >>> +       return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int qm_set_xqc_regs(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
> >>> +                          struct acc_vf_data *vf_data)
> >>> +{
> >>> +       struct hisi_qm *qm = &hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm;
> >>> +       struct device *dev = &qm->pdev->dev;
> >>> +       u32 eqc_addr, aeqc_addr;
> >>> +       int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +       if (hisi_acc_vdev->drv_mode == HW_ACC_V3) {
> >>> +               eqc_addr = QM_EQC_DW0;
> >>> +               aeqc_addr = QM_AEQC_DW0;
> >>> +       } else {
> >>> +               eqc_addr = QM_EQC_PF_DW0;
> >>> +               aeqc_addr = QM_AEQC_PF_DW0;
> >>> +       }
> >>> +
> >>> +       /* QM_EQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> +       ret = qm_write_regs(qm, eqc_addr, vf_data->qm_eqc_dw, 7);
> >>> +       if (ret) {
> >>> +               dev_err(dev, "failed to write QM_EQC_DW\n");
> >>> +               return ret;
> >>> +       }
> >>> +
> >>> +       /* QM_AEQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> +       ret = qm_write_regs(qm, aeqc_addr, vf_data->qm_aeqc_dw, 7);
> >>> +       if (ret) {
> >>> +               dev_err(dev, "failed to write QM_AEQC_DW\n");
> >>> +               return ret;
> >>> +       }
> >>> +
> >>> +       return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>  static int qm_get_regs(struct hisi_qm *qm, struct acc_vf_data *vf_data)
> >>>  {
> >>>         struct device *dev = &qm->pdev->dev;
> >>> @@ -167,20 +233,6 @@ static int qm_get_regs(struct hisi_qm *qm, struct acc_vf_data *vf_data)
> >>>                 return ret;
> >>>         }
> >>>
> >>> -       /* QM_EQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> -       ret = qm_read_regs(qm, QM_EQC_DW0, vf_data->qm_eqc_dw, 7);
> >>> -       if (ret) {
> >>> -               dev_err(dev, "failed to read QM_EQC_DW\n");
> >>> -               return ret;
> >>> -       }
> >>> -
> >>> -       /* QM_AEQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> -       ret = qm_read_regs(qm, QM_AEQC_DW0, vf_data->qm_aeqc_dw, 7);
> >>> -       if (ret) {
> >>> -               dev_err(dev, "failed to read QM_AEQC_DW\n");
> >>> -               return ret;
> >>> -       }
> >>> -
> >>>         return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -239,20 +291,6 @@ static int qm_set_regs(struct hisi_qm *qm, struct acc_vf_data *vf_data)
> >>>                 return ret;
> >>>         }
> >>>
> >>> -       /* QM_EQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> -       ret = qm_write_regs(qm, QM_EQC_DW0, vf_data->qm_eqc_dw, 7);
> >>> -       if (ret) {
> >>> -               dev_err(dev, "failed to write QM_EQC_DW\n");
> >>> -               return ret;
> >>> -       }
> >>> -
> >>> -       /* QM_AEQC_DW has 7 regs */
> >>> -       ret = qm_write_regs(qm, QM_AEQC_DW0, vf_data->qm_aeqc_dw, 7);
> >>> -       if (ret) {
> >>> -               dev_err(dev, "failed to write QM_AEQC_DW\n");
> >>> -               return ret;
> >>> -       }
> >>> -
> >>>         return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -522,6 +560,10 @@ static int vf_qm_load_data(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
> >>>                 return ret;
> >>>         }
> >>>
> >>> +       ret = qm_set_xqc_regs(hisi_acc_vdev, vf_data);
> >>> +       if (ret)
> >>> +               return ret;
> >>> +
> >>>         ret = hisi_qm_mb(qm, QM_MB_CMD_SQC_BT, qm->sqc_dma, 0, 0);
> >>>         if (ret) {
> >>>                 dev_err(dev, "set sqc failed\n");
> >>> @@ -589,6 +631,10 @@ static int vf_qm_state_save(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
> >>>         vf_data->vf_qm_state = QM_READY;
> >>>         hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm_state = vf_data->vf_qm_state;
> >>>
> >>> +       ret = qm_get_xqc_regs(hisi_acc_vdev, vf_data);
> >>> +       if (ret)
> >>> +               return ret;
> >>> +
> >>>         ret = vf_qm_read_data(vf_qm, vf_data);
> >>>         if (ret)
> >>>                 return ret;
> >>> @@ -1186,34 +1232,52 @@ static int hisi_acc_vf_qm_init(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev)
> >>>  {
> >>>         struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = &hisi_acc_vdev->core_device;
> >>>         struct hisi_qm *vf_qm = &hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm;
> >>> +       struct hisi_qm *pf_qm = hisi_acc_vdev->pf_qm;
> >>>         struct pci_dev *vf_dev = vdev->pdev;
> >>> +       u32 val;
> >>>
> >>> -       /*
> >>> -        * ACC VF dev BAR2 region consists of both functional register space
> >>> -        * and migration control register space. For migration to work, we
> >>> -        * need access to both. Hence, we map the entire BAR2 region here.
> >>> -        * But unnecessarily exposing the migration BAR region to the Guest
> >>> -        * has the potential to prevent/corrupt the Guest migration. Hence,
> >>> -        * we restrict access to the migration control space from
> >>> -        * Guest(Please see mmap/ioctl/read/write override functions).
> >>> -        *
> >>> -        * Please note that it is OK to expose the entire VF BAR if migration
> >>> -        * is not supported or required as this cannot affect the ACC PF
> >>> -        * configurations.
> >>> -        *
> >>> -        * Also the HiSilicon ACC VF devices supported by this driver on
> >>> -        * HiSilicon hardware platforms are integrated end point devices
> >>> -        * and the platform lacks the capability to perform any PCIe P2P
> >>> -        * between these devices.
> >>> -        */
> >>> +       val = readl(pf_qm->io_base + QM_MIG_REGION_SEL);
> >>> +       if (pf_qm->ver > QM_HW_V3 && (val & QM_MIG_REGION_EN))
> >>> +               hisi_acc_vdev->drv_mode = HW_ACC_V4;
> >>> +       else
> >>> +               hisi_acc_vdev->drv_mode = HW_ACC_V3;
> >>
> >> The check is for > QM_HW_V3 and drv_mode is set to HW_ACC_V4. From our
> >> previous discussions I think the expectation is that future hardware will follow
> >> this same behaviour. If that is the case, it is better to rename HW_ACC_  to
> >> something more specific to this change than use the V3/V4 name.
> >>
> >
> > If the goal is merely to reflect the context of this change, it would be better to add
> > a comment describing this change directly at the variable's declaration.
> >
>
> Hi, Shameer:
> If there are no further issues, I will continue using the current naming convention and
> add comments at the declaration sites.

I would still prefer naming it differently than just adding comments.
Maybe something like
below + comments in the header.

if (pf_qm->ver > QM_HW_V3 && (val & QM_MIG_REGION_EN))
     hisi_acc_vdev->mig_ctrl_mode = HW_ACC_MIG_PF_CTRL;
else
    hisi_acc_vdev->mig_ctrl_mode = HW_ACC_MIG_VF_CTRL;

Also please don't respin just for this yet. Please wait for Alex to take a look.

Thanks,
Shameer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ