[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2bjn88b2z.wl-thehajime@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:38:12 +0900
From: Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@...il.com>
To: linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: ricarkol@...gle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] nommu UML
sorry,
I included an unintentional patch in the series ([PATCH v11 06/14])
so, will resend this version very soon.
-- Hajime
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:15:53 +0900,
Hajime Tazaki wrote:
>
> This patchset is another spin of nommu mode addition to UML. It would
> be nice to hear about your opinions on that.
>
> There are still several limitations/issues which we already found;
> here is the list of those issues.
>
> - memory mapped by loadable modules are not distinguished from
> userspace memory.
>
> -- Hajime
>
> v11:
> - clean up userspace return routine and integrate to userspace() ([04/13])
> - fix direction flag issue on using nolibc memcpy ([04/13])
> - fix a crash issue when using usermode helper ([06/13])
> - test with out-of-tree kunit-uapi patches (which uses umh)
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250626-kunit-kselftests-v4-0-48760534fef5@linutronix.de/
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250626195714.2123694-3-benjamin@sipsolutions.net/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists