[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0330c18-11fb-473b-8ed8-891dad16ca78@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:18:45 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com>, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, jesper.nilsson@...s.com, lars.persson@...s.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com
Cc: ksk4725@...sia.com, smn1196@...sia.com, linux-arm-kernel@...s.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, pjsin865@...sia.com, gwk1013@...sia.com,
bread@...sia.com, jspark@...sia.com, limjh0823@...sia.com,
lightwise@...sia.com, hgkim05@...sia.com, mingyoungbo@...sia.com,
shradha.t@...sung.com, swathi.ks@...sung.com, kenkim@...sia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Add support for the Axis ARTPEC-9 SoC
On 18/09/2025 12:36, Ravi Patel wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> Sent: 18 September 2025 06:35
>> To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com>; robh@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org; jesper.nilsson@...s.com;
>> lars.persson@...s.com; mturquette@...libre.com; sboyd@...nel.org; alim.akhtar@...sung.com; s.nawrocki@...sung.com;
>> cw00.choi@...sung.com
>> Cc: ksk4725@...sia.com; smn1196@...sia.com; linux-arm-kernel@...s.com; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org; pjsin865@...sia.com;
>> gwk1013@...sia.com; bread@...sia.com; jspark@...sia.com; limjh0823@...sia.com; lightwise@...sia.com; hgkim05@...sia.com;
>> mingyoungbo@...sia.com; shradha.t@...sung.com; swathi.ks@...sung.com; kenkim@...sia.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Add support for the Axis ARTPEC-9 SoC
>>
>> On 17/09/2025 17:49, Ravi Patel wrote:
>>> Add basic support for the Axis ARTPEC-9 SoC which contains
>>> 6-core Cortex-A55 CPU and other several IPs. This SoC is an
>>> Axis-designed chipset used in surveillance camera products.
>>>
>>> This ARTPEC-9 SoC has a variety of Samsung-specific IP blocks and
>>> Axis-specific IP blocks and SoC is manufactured by Samsung Foundry.
>>>
>>> This patch series includes below changes:
>>> - CMU (Clock Management Unit) driver and its bindings (patch #1 to #3)
>>> - PMU bindings (patch #4)
>>> - Basic Device Tree for ARTPEC-9 SoC and boards (patch #5 to #7)
>>>
>>> The patch series has been tested on the ARTPEC-9 EVB with
>>> Linux Samsung SoC tree (for-next branch) and intended
>>> to be merged via the `arm-soc` tree.
>>>
>>> NOTE: This patch series is dependent on following floating patches:
>>> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250917070004.87872-1-ravi.patel@samsung.com/T/#t
>>
>> NAK, sorry, DTS cannot depend on the drivers. Please decouple the
>> dependencies.
>
> Ok, so you want patch #1 - #5 in separate series and #6 - #7 (DTS patches) in another series.
No, I meant above dependencies. You said that these patchset, including
DTS, depends on above. Above are drivers and that's a no go. I said it
multiple times already in various occasions.
Patchset should be organized per maintainers subsystem, but that's
different question.
> Can you please review the patches, I will address review comments in v2 (if any) itself.
As mentioned in other threads, I closed my tree a week ago (if you are
surprised, notice kernel cycles and development process), so review will
happen a bit later.
>
>>
>> Maybe you wanted to point me where the bindings are, but then say so.
>
> Yes, these dependencies are for bindings related.
So not really a dependency so again: just provide links to the bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists