linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: move parse_acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0020389a-676c-74ab-b68f-cd0a44538980@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:23:33 +0800
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
To: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<will@...nel.org>, <sudeep.holla@....com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<rafael@...nel.org>, <dakr@...nel.org>, <beata.michalska@....com>,
	<sumitg@...dia.com>, <ptsm@...ux.microsoft.com>, <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common
 code

On 2025/9/18 9:48, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> Currently, RISC-V lacks arch-specific registers for CPU topology
> properties and must get them from ACPI. Thus, parse_acpi_topology()
> is moved from arm64/ to drivers/ for RISC-V reuse.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c  | 87 +---------------------------------
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c  | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 5d07ee85bdae4..55650db53b526 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>  #include <asm/topology.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> +bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
>  {
>  	int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
>  
> @@ -39,91 +39,6 @@ static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
>  
>  	return !!is_threaded;
>  }
> -
> -struct cpu_smt_info {
> -	unsigned int thread_num;
> -	int core_id;
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * Propagate the topology information of the processor_topology_node tree to the
> - * cpu_topology array.
> - */
> -int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> -{
> -	unsigned int max_smt_thread_num = 1;
> -	struct cpu_smt_info *entry;
> -	struct xarray hetero_cpu;
> -	unsigned long hetero_id;
> -	int cpu, topology_id;
> -
> -	if (acpi_disabled)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	xa_init(&hetero_cpu);
> -
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -		topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0);
> -		if (topology_id < 0)
> -			return topology_id;
> -
> -		if (acpi_cpu_is_threaded(cpu)) {
> -			cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = topology_id;
> -			topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 1);
> -			cpu_topology[cpu].core_id   = topology_id;
> -
> -			/*
> -			 * In the PPTT, CPUs below a node with the 'identical
> -			 * implementation' flag have the same number of threads.
> -			 * Count the number of threads for only one CPU (i.e.
> -			 * one core_id) among those with the same hetero_id.
> -			 * See the comment of find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id()
> -			 * for more details.
> -			 *
> -			 * One entry is created for each node having:
> -			 * - the 'identical implementation' flag
> -			 * - its parent not having the flag
> -			 */
> -			hetero_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(cpu);
> -			entry = xa_load(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
> -			if (!entry) {
> -				entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> -				WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry);
> -
> -				if (entry) {
> -					entry->core_id = topology_id;
> -					entry->thread_num = 1;
> -					xa_store(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id,
> -						 entry, GFP_KERNEL);
> -				}
> -			} else if (entry->core_id == topology_id) {
> -				entry->thread_num++;
> -			}
> -		} else {
> -			cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id  = -1;
> -			cpu_topology[cpu].core_id    = topology_id;
> -		}
> -		topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster(cpu);
> -		cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = topology_id;
> -		topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> -		cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * This is a short loop since the number of XArray elements is the
> -	 * number of heterogeneous CPU clusters. On a homogeneous system
> -	 * there's only one entry in the XArray.
> -	 */
> -	xa_for_each(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id, entry) {
> -		max_smt_thread_num = max(max_smt_thread_num, entry->thread_num);
> -		xa_erase(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
> -		kfree(entry);
> -	}
> -
> -	cpu_smt_set_num_threads(max_smt_thread_num, max_smt_thread_num);
> -	xa_destroy(&hetero_cpu);
> -	return 0;
> -}
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 1037169abb459..c22746b45d57a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -823,12 +823,99 @@ void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu)
>  	clear_cpu_topology(cpu);
>  }
>  
> +__weak bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> +{
> +	int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
> +
> +	return !!is_threaded;
> +}
> +

you seem to miss the comment here in v1. acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread() may return
-ENOENT, in which case the CPU shouldn't be threaded?

thanks.