[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63eae916-a404-4fae-b870-203b7e376363@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:17:32 +0800
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
To: Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpftool: Fix UAF in get_delegate_value
在 2025/9/18 00:30, Quentin Monnet 写道:
> 2025-09-17 11:47 UTC+0800 ~ Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
>> The return value ret pointer is pointing opts_copy, but opts_copy
>> gets freed in get_delegate_value before return, fix this by free
>> the mntent->mnt_opts strdup memory after show delegate value.
>>
>> Fixes: 2d812311c2b2 ("bpftool: Add bpf_token show")
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
>> ---
>> tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c
>> index 82b829e44c8..05bc76c7276 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c
>> @@ -28,15 +28,14 @@ static bool has_delegate_options(const char *mnt_ops)
>> strstr(mnt_ops, "delegate_attachs");
>> }
>>
>> -static char *get_delegate_value(const char *opts, const char *key)
>> +static char *get_delegate_value(char *opts, const char *key)
>> {
>> char *token, *rest, *ret = NULL;
>> - char *opts_copy = strdup(opts);
>>
>> - if (!opts_copy)
>> + if (!opts)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - for (token = strtok_r(opts_copy, ",", &rest); token;
>> + for (token = strtok_r(opts, ",", &rest); token;
>> token = strtok_r(NULL, ",", &rest)) {
>> if (strncmp(token, key, strlen(key)) == 0 &&
>> token[strlen(key)] == '=') {
>> @@ -44,24 +43,19 @@ static char *get_delegate_value(const char *opts, const char *key)
>> break;
>> }
>> }
>> - free(opts_copy);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static void print_items_per_line(const char *input, int items_per_line)
>> +static void print_items_per_line(char *input, int items_per_line)
>> {
>> - char *str, *rest, *strs;
>> + char *str, *rest;
>> int cnt = 0;
>>
>> if (!input)
>> return;
>>
>> - strs = strdup(input);
>> - if (!strs)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - for (str = strtok_r(strs, ":", &rest); str;
>> + for (str = strtok_r(input, ":", &rest); str;
>> str = strtok_r(NULL, ":", &rest)) {
>> if (cnt % items_per_line == 0)
>> printf("\n\t ");
>> @@ -69,38 +63,39 @@ static void print_items_per_line(const char *input, int items_per_line)
>> printf("%-20s", str);
>> cnt++;
>> }
>> -
>> - free(strs);
>> }
>>
>> +#define PRINT_DELEGATE_OPT(opt_name) do { \
>> + char *opts, *value; \
>> + opts = strdup(mntent->mnt_opts); \
>> + value = get_delegate_value(opts, opt_name); \
>> + print_items_per_line(value, ITEMS_PER_LINE); \
>> + free(opts); \
>> +} while (0)
>
>
> Thanks! The fix looks OK to me, but why do you need to have
> PRINT_DELEGATE_OPT*() as macros? Can't you just use functions instead?
>
> Quentin
Well, actually, there is no special purpose about using macros, i will
use functions as you and Andrri suggested, thanks.
--
Best Regards
Tao Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists