[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250918014953.297897-9-csander@purestorage.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 19:49:44 -0600
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/17] ublk: don't access ublk_queue in ublk_register_io_buf()
For ublk servers with many ublk queues, accessing the ublk_queue in
ublk_register_io_buf() is a frequent cache miss. Get the flags from the
ublk_device instead, which is accessed earlier in
ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local().
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index cb51f3f3cd33..751ec62655f8 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -2131,11 +2131,11 @@ static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
unsigned int index, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct request *req;
int ret;
- if (!ublk_support_zero_copy(ubq))
+ if (!ublk_dev_support_zero_copy(ub))
return -EINVAL;
req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, ubq, io, 0);
if (!req)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists