linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/3] mtd: spinand: fix continuous reading mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7ba32b86-77bd-42b1-97fe-136a01ab2917@iopsys.eu>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:08:17 +0300
From: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...sys.eu>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
 <vigneshr@...com>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
 Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@...utedevices.com>,
 Takahiro Kuwano <Takahiro.Kuwano@...ineon.com>,
 Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Gnau <andreas.gnau@...sys.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 0/3] mtd: spinand: fix continuous reading mode
 support

Hello Miquèl,

On 18.09.2025 11:26, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
>> Changes v5:
>>  * rename spinand_create_rdesc_helper() to spinand_create_rdesc()
>>  * get rid of controller_is_buggy boolean
> I received patch 0 and 1 over 3 only.

Quite strange, you was in the "--to" list. Also
https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/9/18/15 see all the series. Could you check
your spam folder and mailer settings?

> Plus, what is the reason for the resend?
No any activities/responds for 2 weeks. This looks like the mails were
lost in the tons of other mails :-(
>  This series was no longer in my watch list which means I was
> probably expecting changes on it, which would have lead to a version
> increase. Can you please clarify?
Hm, I think, I resolve all the issues you mentioned before (in v4 and
v5). Could you look one more time?
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl


Thanks,
Mikhail Kshevetskiy