[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=XXvk-okceUAnpwkk5W5kFLecyoNJcVU9Rb3g=M9qA8ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:04:26 +0200
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Ethan Graham <ethan.w.s.graham@...il.com>, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: ethangraham@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com, andy@...nel.org,
brauner@...nel.org, brendan.higgins@...ux.dev, davem@...emloft.net,
davidgow@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
elver@...gle.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, ignat@...udflare.com,
jack@...e.cz, jannh@...gle.com, johannes@...solutions.net,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, kees@...nel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, lukas@...ner.de, rmoar@...gle.com, sj@...nel.org,
tarasmadan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/10] KFuzzTest: a new kernel fuzzing framework
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 4:58 PM Ethan Graham <ethan.w.s.graham@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ethan Graham <ethangraham@...gle.com>
>
> This patch series introduces KFuzzTest, a lightweight framework for
> creating in-kernel fuzz targets for internal kernel functions.
Hi Shuah,
Since these are all fundamentally test code, I was wondering if the
selftests tree would be the appropriate path for merging them?
If you agree, would you be open to picking them up once the review is done?
Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists