[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250919-lovely-amethyst-bullmastiff-5cef8b-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 21:18:21 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Propagate return value
of gpiod_set_value_cansleep
On 09.09.2025 13:40:15, Peng Fan wrote:
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep might return failure, propagate the return value
> of gpiod_set_value_cansleep to parent.
Are there any expectations of the phy framework from the driver if the
switch on or off fails? Do you have to roll back any changes in case of
an error?
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists