[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9b9efaaf192d4f8b6fa4d93f964dfc7a6493e5c.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 19:26:20 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev"
<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, "Zhao, Yan
Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "mingo@...hat.com"
<mingo@...hat.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Yamahata, Isaku"
<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] x86/virt/tdx: Simplify tdmr_get_pamt_sz()
On Fri, 2025-09-19 at 00:50 +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > + nid, &node_online_map);
> > + if (!pamt) {
> > + /* Zero base so that the error path will skip freeing. */
> > + tdmr->pamt_4k_base = 0;
> > return -ENOMEM;
>
> Do you need to zero the base here? IIUC, it hasn't been setup yet if PAMT
> allocation fails. All TDMRs are allocated with __GFP_ZERO, so it should
> be 0 already when PAMT allocation fails here.
Oh, you are right. It's zero allocated. Hmm a comment should probably go
somewhere still.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists