linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi: cadence-qspi: defer runtime support on socfpga if reset bit is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <175827981475.43867.14880057766309432470.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:03:34 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...era.com>, 
 Niravkumar L Rabara <nirav.rabara@...era.com>, 
 Adrian Ng Ho Yin <adrianhoyin.ng@...era.com>, 
 Khairul Anuar Romli <khairul.anuar.romli@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi: cadence-qspi: defer runtime support on
 socfpga if reset bit is enabled

On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:06:32 +0800, Khairul Anuar Romli wrote:
> Enabling runtime PM allows the kernel to gate clocks and power to idle
> devices. On SoCFPGA, a warm reset does not fully reinitialize these
> domains.This leaves devices suspended and powered down, preventing U-Boot
> or the kernel from reusing them after a warm reset, which breaks the boot
> process.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: cadence-qspi: defer runtime support on socfpga if reset bit is enabled
      commit: 30dbc1c8d50f13c1581b49abe46fe89f393eacbf

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark