[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250919115805.GU1326709@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:58:05 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Alex Mastro <amastro@...com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, David Reiss <dreiss@...a.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Li Zhe <lizhe.67@...edance.com>, Mahmoud Adam <mngyadam@...zon.de>,
Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Kasireddy, Vivek" <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TECH TOPIC] vfio, iommufd: Enabling user space drivers to vend
more granular access to client processes
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 07:00:04AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> memory of other clients and the USD... there is no hw isolation
> within a partitioned IOAS unless the device supports PASID then
> each client can be associated to its own IOAS space.
If the device does support pasid then both of the suggestions make
a lot more security sense..
Jsaon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists