linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: make is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250919213502.2d621c5b19e059134d0f8991@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 21:35:02 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>, jolsa@...nel.org,
 tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
 kees@...nel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
 mhiramat@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: make is_endbr() notrace

On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 18:56:56 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 09:32:27PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 9:05???PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 08:09:39PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > > > is_endbr() is called in __ftrace_return_to_handler -> fprobe_return ->
> > > > kprobe_multi_link_exit_handler -> is_endbr.
> > > >
> > > > It is not protected by the "bpf_prog_active", so it can't be traced by
> > > > kprobe-multi, which can cause recurring and panic the kernel. Fix it by
> > > > make it notrace.
> > >
> > > This is very much a riddle wrapped in an enigma. Notably
> > > kprobe_multi_link_exit_handler() does not call is_endbr(). Nor is that
> > > cryptic next line sufficient to explain why its a problem.
> > >
> > > I suspect the is_endbr() you did mean is the one in
> > > arch_ftrace_get_symaddr(), but who knows.
> > 
> > Yeah, I mean
> > kprobe_multi_link_exit_handler -> ftrace_get_entry_ip ->
> > arch_ftrace_get_symaddr -> is_endbr
> > actually. And CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT is enabled of course.
> > 
> > >
> > > Also, depending on compiler insanity, it is possible the thing
> > > out-of-lines things like __is_endbr(), getting you yet another
> > > __fentry__ site.
> > 
> > The panic happens when I run the bpf bench testing:
> >   ./bench kretprobe-multi-all
> > 
> > And skip the "is_endbr" fix this problem.
> 
> But why does it panic? Supposedly you've done the analysis; but then
> forgot to write it down?

Yeah, that is an fprobe's bug. It should not panic. I sent a fix.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/175828305637.117978.4183947592750468265.stgit@devnote2/

Thank you,

> 
> Why is kprobe_multi_link_exit_handler() special; doesn't the issue also
> exist with kprobe_multi_link_handler() ? If so, removing __fentry__
> isn't going to help much, you can just stick an actual kprobe in
> is_endbr(), right?
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>