[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250920104251.3f7dcbb2@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 10:42:51 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>
Cc: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, <eblanc@...libre.com>, <dlechner@...libre.com>,
<andy@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>, <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>,
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>, Trevor Gamblin
<tgamblin@...libre.com>, Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] iio: adc: ad4030: Add SPI offload support
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:39:10 -0300
Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com> wrote:
> AD4030 and similar ADCs can capture data at sample rates up to 2 mega
> samples per second (MSPS). Not all SPI controllers are able to achieve such
> high throughputs and even when the controller is fast enough to run
> transfers at the required speed, it may be costly to the CPU to handle
> transfer data at such high sample rates. Add SPI offload support for AD4030
> and similar ADCs to enable data capture at maximum sample rates.
>
> Co-developed-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> Co-developed-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
> Co-developed-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>
> ---
> Most of the code for SPI offload support is based on work from Sergiu Cuciurean,
> Nuno Sa, Axel Haslam, and Trevor Gamblin. Thus, this patch comes with many
> co-developed-by tags. I also draw inspiration from other drivers supporting SPI
> offload, many of them written by David Lechner.
>
> Change log v1 -> v2
> - Dropped all clock-modes and DDR related stuff for now as those will require
> further changes to the SPI subsystem or to SPI controller drivers.
> - Update the modes register with proper output data mode bits when sample
> averaging (oversampling_ratio) is set.
> - Lock on device state mutex before updating oversampling and sampling frequency.
> - Made sampling_frequency shared by all channels.
> - Better checking the requested sampling frequency is valid.
> - Adjusted to SPI offload data capture preparation and stop procedures.
> - Error out if try to get/set sampling frequency without offload trigger.
> - Depend on PWM so build always succeed.
> - Drop unmatched/unbalanced call to iio_device_release_direct().
> - No longer shadowing error codes.
>
> Suggestions to v1 that I did not comply to:
> [SPI]
> > I would be tempted to put the loop check here [in drivers/spi/spi-offload-trigger-pwm.c]:
> >
> > offload_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns;
> >
> > do {
> > wf.offset_ns = offload_offset_ns;
> > ret = pwm_round_waveform_might_sleep(st->pwm, &wf);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > offload_offset_ns += 10;
> >
> > } while (wf.offset_ns < periodic->offset_ns);
> >
> > wf.duty_offset_ns = periodic->offset_ns;
> >
> > instead of in the ADC driver so that all future callers don't have to
> > repeat this.
>
> Not sure implementing the PWM trigger phase approximation/rounding/setup within
> spi-offload-trigger-pwm is actually desirable. The PWM phase
> approximation/rounding/setup done in AD4030 iterates over the configuration of a
> second PWM (the PWM connected to the CNV pin). I haven't seen any other device
> that would use such double PWM setup schema so pushing an additional argument to
> spi_offload_trigger_pwm_validate() doesn't seem worth it.
>
> [IIO]
> > Why using slower speed for offload?
> Looks like it's the same max speed for both register access and data sample.
> So, just reusing the existing define for the max transfer speed.
>
> drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/iio/adc/ad4030.c | 485 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
Hi Marcelo
Just one thing I noticed today. If nothing else comes up I can fix that
up whilst applying. However, this will benefit from review from others
+ the IIO tree is effectively closed for this cycle so we have lots of time
to tidy up any remaining stuff.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4030.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4030.c
> index aa0e27321869..52805c779934 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4030.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4030.c
> +static int ad4030_offload_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct ad4030_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, AD4030_REG_EXIT_CFG_MODE, BIT(0));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ad4030_prepare_offload_msg(indio_dev);
> + st->offload_msg.offload = st->offload;
> + ret = spi_optimize_message(st->spi, &st->offload_msg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_reset_mode;
> +
> + ret = pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep(st->cnv_trigger, &st->cnv_wf, false);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unoptimize;
> +
> + ret = spi_offload_trigger_enable(st->offload, st->offload_trigger,
> + &st->offload_trigger_config);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_pwm_disable;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_pwm_disable:
> + pwm_disable(st->cnv_trigger);
> +out_unoptimize:
> + spi_unoptimize_message(&st->offload_msg);
> +out_reset_mode:
> + /* reenter register configuration mode */
> + ret = ad4030_enter_config_mode(st);
This blows away the original error. I'd do something like
if (ad40303_enter_config_mode(st))
dev_err(...)
return ret;
so we preserve whatever went wrong first.
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(&st->spi->dev,
> + "couldn't reenter register configuration mode\n");
> + return ret;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists