[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<175832700584.3744610.12963791321568877888.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 00:10:05 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: rogerq@...com, danishanwar@...com, parvathi@...thit.com,
rogerq@...nel.org, pmohan@...thit.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
basharath@...thit.com, afd@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ti: icssm-prueth: unwind cleanly in probe()
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:48:26 +0300 you wrote:
> This error handling triggers a Smatch warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssm/icssm_prueth.c:1574 icssm_prueth_probe()
> warn: 'prueth->pru1' is an error pointer or valid
>
> The warning is harmless because the pru_rproc_put() function has an
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check built in. However, there is a small bug if
> syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() fails. In that case we should call
> of_node_put() on eth0_node and eth1_node.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: ti: icssm-prueth: unwind cleanly in probe()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5fc7fa743dbf
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists