linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix incorrect errno used in function comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250921081854.1059094-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 01:18:48 -0700
From: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: selvin.xavier@...adcom.com, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com,
        jgg@...pe.ca, leon@...nel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix incorrect errno used in function comments

The function comments in qplib_rcfw.c mention -ETIMEOUT as a
possible return value. However, the correct errno is -ETIMEDOUT.

Update the comments to reflect the proper return value to avoid
confusion for developers and users referring to the code.

Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c
index 5e34395472c5..295a9610f3e6 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int __wait_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie)
  * wait for command completion. Maximum holding interval is 8 second.
  *
  * Returns:
- * -ETIMEOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.
+ * -ETIMEDOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.
  * 0 if command is completed by firmware.
  */
 static int __block_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie)
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __send_message(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw,
  * This function can not be called from non-sleepable context.
  *
  * Returns:
- * -ETIMEOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.
+ * -ETIMEDOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.
  * 0 if command is completed by firmware.
  */
 static int __poll_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie)
-- 
2.50.1