[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250921222743.GE10540@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 01:27:43 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Guoniu Zhou <guoniu.zhou@....com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] media: nxp: imx8-isi: Add ISI support for i.MX91
Hi Guoniu,
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 02:56:02PM +0800, Guoniu Zhou wrote:
> The ISI module on i.MX91 implements only one channel and one parallel
> camera input. As no input source selection is required, gasket ops are
> unnecessary.
>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Guoniu Zhou <guoniu.zhou@....com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.c
> index 0155c75983f02f33f7f0669e73188222ebb5e816..c3d411ddf492eb27b372763ce5d344a90c6ec524 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,17 @@ static const struct mxc_isi_plat_data mxc_imx8ulp_data = {
> .has_36bit_dma = false,
> };
>
> +static const struct mxc_isi_plat_data mxc_imx91_data = {
> + .model = MXC_ISI_IMX91,
> + .num_ports = 1,
> + .num_channels = 1,
> + .reg_offset = 0,
> + .ier_reg = &mxc_imx8_isi_ier_v2,
> + .set_thd = &mxc_imx8_isi_thd_v1,
> + .buf_active_reverse = true,
> + .has_36bit_dma = false,
> +};
> +
> static const struct mxc_isi_plat_data mxc_imx93_data = {
> .model = MXC_ISI_IMX93,
> .num_ports = 1,
> @@ -547,6 +558,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id mxc_isi_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-isi", .data = &mxc_imx8qm_data },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8qxp-isi", .data = &mxc_imx8qxp_data },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-isi", .data = &mxc_imx8ulp_data },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx91-isi", .data = &mxc_imx91_data },
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-isi", .data = &mxc_imx93_data },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.h b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.h
> index e84af5127e4e7938e55e31b7063bee5e2cd4cb11..3cbd35305af0f8026c4f76b5eb5d0864f8e36dc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-core.h
> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ enum model {
> MXC_ISI_IMX8QM,
> MXC_ISI_IMX8QXP,
> MXC_ISI_IMX8ULP,
> + MXC_ISI_IMX91,
> MXC_ISI_IMX93,
> };
The model field is unused, should we drop it ? That's a candidate for a
separate patch, for this patch
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists