[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922044425.GB14753@nxa18884-linux.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:44:25 +0800
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Propagate return value
of gpiod_set_value_cansleep
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 09:18:21PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>On 09.09.2025 13:40:15, Peng Fan wrote:
>> gpiod_set_value_cansleep might return failure, propagate the return value
>> of gpiod_set_value_cansleep to parent.
>
>Are there any expectations of the phy framework from the driver if the
>switch on or off fails? Do you have to roll back any changes in case of
>an error?
The phy framework expects return value, so if on or off fails, the
phy framework will record and handle properly, but if one of GPIO settings
fail, the driver itself should handle it and need to roll back. I will update
in V7.
Thanks,
Peng
>
>Marc
>
>--
>Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
>Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
>Vertretung N??rnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
>Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists